LVD's system posted over on Isaac's board interested me, after some testing, it failed..
I dropped it and then restarted it, in a hedging fashion, using Lanky's idea, in a new-ish method.
Still testing it on Zumma Bacc Book.
However, here are the results.
If i get past 40 or so tables and its winning, if you want the system you Drunkard, I will e-mail it for your testing.
1 bust is 15 units, if the table ends positive, it means that the table garnered more units than busts.
BST is a bust of -15 units, sometimes its -16 units, rarely.
2 bsts is -30 units or -32 units. If the results say +2, 3 bst..means 3 busts which is -45 units plus 47 units for a net positive gain of 2 units.
Got it?
Results for now.
Table/+ or - Units/Bsts
1 +30 2 +38 3 +2 4 +9, 2bsts 5 +11, 2 busts 6 -11, 3 bsts 7 +13, 1 bst 8 -15, 1 bst 9 +29, 1 bst 10 -2, 2 bsts 11 -6, 2 bsts 12 +1 13 +1 14 0 15 0 16 +9 17 0, 1bst 18 +9, 1 bst 19 -15, 1 bst 20 -19, 2 bsts 21 -40, 3 bsts 22 -13 23 +22 24 +16
+60 Gross, atm or 2.5 units per shoe. Max downdraw for one shoe is -40 units, for now, hasnt gone negative versus the grand total units.
I think, personally, due to commission, i wouldnt play bacc with it..Maybe roulette, or craps.
Probably craps since the edge is lower. But you probably want a fairly fast game. So if its roulette, it would be much faster. For the zeros, i personally would just repeat bet.
Well, I'll do some more testing, see if its' legs keep walkin'.
Redhunter
|